About PARC
Departments
Annual Plans & Reports
Branches & Offices
Media
C O R D A
Guest Book
Contact Us
Main Page
 
 

    International Women’s Day in the Palestinian Rural Context

    March 7, 2007

     

On March 8, global women, women’s groups, some political parties and social movements celebrate International Women’s Day around the world to stress support for women’s rights to equality, justice, peace and development. This day represents the struggle for the improvement of women’s situations and the demand for ample opportunities and options that can ensure a real partnership between men and women to push forward the wheel of human rights based sustainable development.

For more than two decades, the Palestinian Agricultural relief Committees (PARC) has been implementing programs and interventions in support of rural women. Through PARC’s experience and continuous interaction with these women, we realize the sizeable marginalization, exclusion and discrimination facing Palestinian rural women that persists for ages. Therefore, on the occasion of the International Women's Day, we wish to highlight the situations of these women hoping this will encourage stakeholders and concerned actors to give proper attention to rural women in the OPT. We attribute the state of marginalization and exclusion that Palestinian rural women face to the following factors:

  1. The Israeli occupation’s bloody and destructive policies and impact on the rural and agricultural infrastructure and social fabric additional to the economic, social, political and mental health ramifications. As the case of all women being victims of conflicts and occupation around the world, the Palestinian rural women experience occupation differently from men and from their urban counterparts. This is so because they are vulnerable to poverty and unemployment on one hand. And they have to assume the burdens of poverty by finding alternative coping strategies to ensure a subsistence living for their families. It is true to say that the Palestinian rural women who are victims of poverty are the ones who lead the battle against poverty. In the meantime, these women are taken away from the battle against their exclusion from the development process. Palestinian rural women have been the direct target of the Israeli violence. During the years 2000-2006¹, 351 women got killed, most of them were from villages. Thousands of women were wounded or arrested during the same period. As such, the basic right to life has been blatantly violated by the Israeli occupation authorities.

  2. The construction of the Apartheid wall in the West Bank resulted in the destruction of the agricultural sector; more than 247,291 dunums of agricultural lands were leveled², hundreds of thousands of trees were uprooted, wells, water networks and tanks, cisterns, farms and farmers houses were destroyed. The wall has separated rural women from their agricultural lands. As such, they lost their basic source of income. Additionally, it has cut them off urban support services like education, health, markets and social safety networks, etc.

  3. The occupation, political conflicts, civil wars and internal fighting in the region instigated and inflamed by international interests, market mechanisms, globalization and the American hegemony. These situations inflict poverty and violence on women in our region particularly the Palestinian women; more restrictions on mobility, less options for women; more rural women are caught up in acute poverty; more rural women are killed and wounded, more losses in their economic initiatives due to their inability to move around and to access their produce to the market, less freedoms and personal security, etc.

  4. The political and economic embargo imposed on the Palestinian Authority since 2006 leading up to a major deterioration of the economic situations especially of the weak and marginalized strata in the rural areas which depend on agriculture for their living. Rural women are considered the leading loser under this embargo.

  5. The Palestinian society and culture identified as masculine and conservative. Family is still the source of protection for women particularly rural women. The Palestinian Authority, as such, has denied its obligations and responsibilities towards improving the women’s situations. Furthermore, it’s women who have to make their households the center of their life. Therefore, their children and husbands come first then comes their rights, interests and ambitions. The persisting conservative nature of the Palestinian society is reflected in the under representation of rural women in political parties, legislative institutions and NGOs.

  6. Reforms adopted by the Palestinian Authority in terms of fighting the structural discrimination are superficial and trivial. They did not touch the core of the structural discrimination. Rural women still face legal discrimination in terms of what is known as the personal laws which govern marriage, divorce, children custody, inheritance and violence against women. Additionally, rural women lack the willful exercising of their civil rights. Until 1976, women’s civil right to participate in the elections was denied. Then, an amendment was introduced to the Jordanian Elections Law of 1955 allowing women to participate in the local council elections then.

  7. Marginalization and weak support for rural women persists by the Palestinian Authority which keeps the agricultural and rural sector at the bottom of its priorities and interests. In the 2005 official budget, the agricultural sector received less than 1%. Throughout the years 1990-1999, only 28% of the local councils’ employment went for rural women³, To date, the percentage of women in the total Palestinian work force is still one of the lowest percentages in the region. It stood at 10.5% in 20054.

  8. The paralysis of the Palestinian ministries, the Legislative Council, the police force and the Judiciary system coincided with the escalation of crime acts, the state of insecurity and internal fighting. All these led to a state of chaos and opened the door wide for blatant violations of vulnerable strata particularly women and children. By the end of February the Palestinian police disclosed the news of serial crimes committed against 3 women and a 14 month old baby girl in Gaza. It was said that these besides many tens of women murdered during the past years were killed under the so called protection of “family honor”. Additionally, many women and children got killed whilst caught in the internal fighting and arm conflict between Fatah and Hamas, the two dominant parties in the Palestinian arena.

The situation of the Palestinian rural women can be summarized as follows:

  • A limitation of work opportunities outside the household domain. This is a "normal" consequence of the limited development and employment opportunities that the rural sector in the OPT suffers from due to the following reasons: (1) the continued occupation; (2) the marginalization and exclusion policy of the Palestinian Authority; and (3) the lack of legislations, policies, developmental plans, and measures that can protect the agricultural products against the dumping of the Israeli and foreign products in the Palestinian markets.  Except for the educational and health sectors, rural women have no job opportunities taking into consideration that both sectors offer limited jobs. The majority of the rural women work in agriculture and food processing though it is designated an extension of the household. Therefore, the Palestinian society does not recognize this work as a paid job. People believe it is part of the household duties and responsibilities that women have to assume. Furthermore, they don’t consider it a skillful job. Even rural women themselves have the same attitude towards their work. As such, the agricultural work does not affect rural women’s status at home. It is not part of the recognized reimbursement rights that women are entitled to. This state, if persists, will continue to reproduce the same imbalance in power relations between men and women in the rural sector. The image of man being a productive head of family who plays very important roles and assumes significant responsibilities is maximized whilst woman’s image and status stays very low.

  • An extremely small role that women are allowed to assume regarding the planning process of developmental interventions and programs that NGOs and donors implement in the rural sector. Most of these interventions match up the agendas of the donors and the NGOs and respond mainly to the practical needs of the rural women. They do not meet the strategic needs and the entitled rights. As such, these developmental interventions have never succeeded to challenge the structural discrimination that rural women face on one hand. They have had a very limited impact on women’s capacity and ability to confront the exclusion and imbalance of power relations in the rural sector.

  • A weak role in the institutional work. It is worth noting that implementing planned interventions of urban NGOs that target rural women and families is not the same as empowering rural women and enabling them to reach and control the resources. It is quite essential that rural women run their own organizations that can protect their interests and rights besides expressing their own practical and strategic needs. Rural women need to gain a rich experience of active and influential participation in the development process.

  • A weak role in lobbying and advocacy groups such as women’s movements, NGOs, trade unions, students’ boards, human rights organizations and others. Rural women’s role in the institutionalized political work whether in political secular parties or religious parties as well as their role in the local councils and the Legislative Council is still under expectations. Although rural women have now better opportunities in politics and paid work, yet they confront many on ground obstacles; (1) weak programs that support them, (2) exclusion of women’s priorities from all organizations’ agendas including ministries, NGOs, universities and research centers. The fact that a few hundreds of rural women succeeded to join the local council through the implementation of the Quota5 or through their active economic and political engagement did not affect the women’s access to and control of resources particularly decision making, budget allocations and priorities setting.

  • A limitation of networking and coordination with the external surroundings due to the imposed restriction on rural women’s mobility and traveling between villages and cities. This situation is resulting from the strict closure regime, which Israel imposes on the Palestinian people through military check points, blockades and road blocks which cut off their villages from the other villages and from urban areas. Besides, the huge risks they have to face on the way from home to urban markets and centers for vital services. As a result, rural women are discouraged to leave their over protective community. This thing limited rural women’s freedoms and deprived them of accessing a wider space where they can reinforce networking and coordination efforts for their own benefits.

Following this short synopsis and on the occasion of the International Women’s Day, PARC demands the Palestinian Authority, the judiciary and legislative authorities, the NGOs, the political parties and social movements to uphold to their responsibilities and moral obligations towards the rural women by doing the following:

  1. Recognize the agricultural work as a paid job and undertake all the necessary steps to include it in the national researches and statistics including the GDP and GNP. And to increase rural women’s know how and skills especially in the new agricultural techniques. Additionally, all relevant actors should provide resources and support to women through developmental projects targeting agriculture, land and water development, industrial initiatives based on agricultural produce and infrastructural projects that can generate jobs for women and men alike.

  2. Empower rural women collectively through assisting them to establish their own organizations where they can develop their vision and aims, and plan their programs and interventions. As such, they can have and control a wide space that enables them to improve their skills, build their capacity and increase their interaction.

  3. Reprioritize the scope of support and budget allocations of the Palestinian Authority by giving the agricultural and rural sector proper attention and primacy in terms of legislations, policies and developmental plans.

  4. Adopt a quota for increasing rural women’s representation in decision making centers and the leading assemblies of the political and religious parties as well as in the senior managements of the NGOs that work in the rural areas.

  5. Trust the role of the rural women as equal and active partners in the human development process. And trust their participation in the planning, monitoring and evaluation of implemented interventions and programs.

  6. Provide protection for personal and collective freedoms, and introduce societal reform through enacting legislations and laws based on gender equality. Additional to fighting violence against women and terminating the security chaos.


[1] State Information Service, 20 February 2007

[2] State Information Service, 20 February 2007

[3] Women and Politics under the PA, Nahla Abdo, 1999

[4] Palestinian Women under Occupation: Basic Analysis of their Status, Nadia Moustafa Elrashidi for MIFTAH, July 2005

[5] In the wake of successful lobbying by the women's groups and their civil society supporters, the Palestinian Central Elections Commission allocated two seats per each local council for women during the last councils' elections which were held in four rounds in 2004 through 2005

 

Top